Legal Opinion

State v. Holman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original proceedings in Supreme Court. This is an original proceeding by the State on the information of Walter H. Evans, District Attorney for Multnomah County, against Rufus C. Holman. A demurrer filed by the defendant to the information was sustained and the action dismissed. The facts upon which the action are founded are set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an action analogous to quo warranto instituted in this court, in the name of the state, upon the information of Walter H. Evans, the proper prosecuting attorney, to ascertain the right of Rufus C. Holman to act as- county commissioner of Multnomah County, Oregon; to determine the efficacy of orders made, judgments given, and decrees rendered by Thomas J. Cleeton while acting as a circuit judge of that county and of -other counties of the state; and also to decide the validity of orders, etc., made, given and rendered in all probate matters in Multnomah County since Chapter 378 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Biggs v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lang v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. State v. GeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. CompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Branch v. McCormick's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Leonard v. EkwallOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. VoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Smith v. JeffersonOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Gantenbein v. WestOregon Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API