Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. Buck

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1953PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, C. J.

Appeal by Dr. George H. Buck, a duly licensed physician and surgeon of the state of Oregon, from a judgment of conviction and sentence predicated on the alleged violation of § 23-408, OCLA, known as the Criminal Abortion Act, which is as follows:

“If any person shall administer to any woman pregnant with a child any medicine, drug, or substance whatever, or shall use or employ any instrument or other means, with intent thereby to destroy such child, unless the same shall be necessary to preserve the life of such mother, such person shall, in case the death of such child or mother be thereby…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wood v. State Ex Rel. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. ReamsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Dilger v. School District 24CJOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API