Legal Opinion

Collins v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 2019No. 54/18PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

" Voir dire " is Law French 1 for "to speak the truth[,]" and refers to "[a] preliminary examination of a prospective juror by a [trial court] to decide whether [he or she] is qualified and suitable to serve on a jury." Voir Dire , Black's Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014). Voir dire is critical to implementing a defendant's right to a fair and impartial jury. See Pearson v. State , 437 Md. 350 , 356, 86 A.3d 1232 , 1235 (2014).

"[I]n Maryland, the sole purpose of voir dire is to ensure a fair and impartial jury by determining the existence of specific cause for disqualification." Id. at 356 , 86…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Sweet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Pearson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. United States v. West, MatthewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Kidder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API