Legal Opinion

Kazadi v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 24, 2020No. 11/19PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tshibangu Kazadi v. State of Maryland, No. 11, September Term, 2019 VOIR DIRE – FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS – PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE – BURDEN OF PROOF – RIGHT NOT TO TESTIFY – STARE DECISIS – SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN LAW AND FACTS – DISCOVERY – CROSS- EXAMINATION – IMMIGRATION STATUS – In 1964, fifty-five years ago, in Twining v. State, 234 Md. 97, 100,

198 A.2d 291, 293

(1964), Court of Appeals held that voir dire questions concerning jury instructions were not appropriate. Thus, voir dire questions concerning jurors’ ability and willingness to follow jury instructions on fundamental principles of…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. People v. ZehrIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. TXI Transportation Co. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2010

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Berry & State Farm v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API