Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 14, 2024No. 8/23PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles Mitchell v. State of Maryland, No. 8, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Biran, J. STARE DECISIS – EXCEPTION FOR SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE LAW – The Supreme Court of Maryland abrogated, in part, its decision in Stewart v. State,

399 Md. 146

(2007), under the exception to stare decisis for cases that have been superseded by significant changes in the law. Case law subsequent to Stewart demonstrates that Stewart’s narrow reading of earlier cases involving disqualifying bias toward certain types of witnesses is incorrect. VOIR DIRE – DISQUALIFYING BIAS – CHILD-WITNESSES – The Supreme Court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zukowski v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  2. Zukowski v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API