Legal Opinion

Williams v. General Mills, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 3, 1941No. 4538PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICARD, District Judge.

This is an action brought by Samuel Williams “on behalf of himself and other employees of defendant similarly situated” v. General Mills, Inc., to recover “stipulated damages” for failure of defendant to observe the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

Plaintiff, Samuel Williams and three others were watchmen and one John Morco was a maintenance man during the summer months and a watchman during the winter months at defendant’s Larrowe plant near Toledo, Ohio.

Just two days prior to the effective date of the Fair Labor Standards Act…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Reeves v. Howard County Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
  3. A. H. Belo Corp. v. StreetDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941
  4. Fleming v. Carleton Screw Products Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
  5. Remer v. CzajaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  2. Bumpus v. Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Carleton Screw Products Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Slover v. WathenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Anuchick v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API