Legal Opinion
Bumpus v. Continental Baking Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1941No. 9017PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to § 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Title 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., appellant, who was formerly employed by appellee in its wholesale baking establishment at Memphis, Tennessee, sought to recover unpaid compensation, an equal amount as liquidated damages, and a reasonable attorney’s fee. Title 29 U.S.C § 216(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b).
The District Court, sitting without a jury, found that the appellant was engaged in commerce or in the production of goods in commerce and entitled to the benefits of the Act. This holding is not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Edward's Lessee v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Roland Electrical Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.