Reeves v. Howard County Refining Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
The Court understands the law to be that this Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.) is what the name implies, a minimum wage and hour Act, and that parties may contract with reference to hours and compensation at will, provided the compensation to be paid is not less than the scale fixed by the law. It thus becomes important for the determination of the rights of the several employees involved to arrive at the nature of the contract or agreement under which they were' working, and have been working since the passage of the Act.
C. C. Reeves testified that he had for some…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Bumpus v. Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Klotz v. IppolitoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
- Slover v. WathenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- St. John v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.