Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1983No. AO18674PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, J.

Civil Code section 4607 requires prehearing mediation of child custody and visitation disputes in marital dissolution proceedings conducted pursuant to the Family Law Act. (Civ. Code, pt. 5, commencing with § 4000.) The statute also provides that, if the parties fail to agree in the mediation proceedings, the mediator “may, consistent with local court rules, render a recommendation to the court as to the custody or visitation of the child or children” involved. Pursuant to this provision, respondent superior court has adopted a “local court rule,” or policy, which (1)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In Re BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re Malinda S.California Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Caldwell v. Samuels JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. In Re Mary S.California Court of Appeal · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API