Craig v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The plaintiffs Mary Lynde Craig and Samuel Lynde Foster recovered judgment against defendants for the possession of certain premises, together with the sum of fifteen hundred dollars damages, with interest and costs, in an action of unlawful detainer.
The defendants have appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial, and from so much of the judgment, as awards damages, but not from that portion which awards possession of the premises to plaintiffs.
Appellants urge that “the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,” and contend that the complaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Hutchings v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. Ambassador Park SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Vatuone v. CannobioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Lish v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1931