Legal Opinion

Commissioners to Manage Yosemite Valley & Mariposa Big Tree Grove v. Barnard

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1893No. 18093PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Mariposa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action of unlawful detainer. The complaint contains the ordinary allegations in an action of unlawful detainer brought by a landlord against his tenant, who continues in possession against the will of the landlord after the expiration of the term. The defendant made no denial of these allegations, except that he denied that the term for which the premises were demised had expired, or that he held over contrary to the terms of the lease. He pleaded, however, as a separate defense to the action, that he signed the lease set forth in the complaint, but that that portion thereof fixing the term…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McCreary v. MarstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Rudel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Frascona v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Rubenstein v. SwagartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Vatuone v. CannobioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API