Legal Opinion
Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Daniels
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1942No. 28682PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
June 29, 1940, Eba’s Inc. made an assignment for the benefit of creditors to Seattle Association of Credit Men. The assignee brought this action to recover, as a preference, a payment of $280.23 made by the assignor to the defendants, Daniels and Turn-quist, on April 10, 1940.
The facts out of which the controversy arose are as follows: On or about February 9, 1940, Eba’s Inc. entered into a contract with the defendants, who are building contractors, for the repair and alteration of the store front of premises occupied by the former at 500 Queen Anne avenue in Seattle. The work was done “on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Libby v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Whiting v. RubinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Engstrom v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- W. T. Watts, Inc. v. SherrerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Jackson v. FlohrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Soderberg Advertising, Inc. v. Kent-Moore Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.