Legal Opinion

Paulin v. Paulin

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1996No. A071772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that a child support payor was entitled to a statutory hardship deduction due to justifiable expenses resulting from the birth of twins to *1381himself and his present wife which caused extreme financial hardship. We also hold, where the former wife had remarried and had voluntarily ceased her employment, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by fixing her income, for purposes of the statutory child support formula, based upon her earning capacity.

Robyn Paulin appeals from a superior court order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. County of Lake v. AntoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. In Re the Marriage of RegneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Petropoulos v. PetropoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. In Re Marriage of DacumosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Carlsen v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API