Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Dacumos
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1999No. C030209PublishedCited by 8 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Eduardo Dacumos appeals from a judgment awarding child support and attorney fees to his ex-wife, Hilda Dacumos. Eduardo contends the trial court abused its discretion in imputing rental income to determine his income, including the entirety of his 401 (k) plan distributions in determining his income, in excluding Hilda’s second job from her income, and in awarding Hilda attorney fees. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Hilda and Eduardo were married in 1989 and had a son the following year. They separated March 4, 1991. A judgment of dissolution was entered in 1992,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Marriage of RegneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Paulin v. PaulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Guigne v. GuigneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sorge v. SorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Destein v. DesteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Henry v. ReissmuellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.