In Re Marriage of Stephenson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
Following the dissolution of their 31-year marriage, Norlene Stephenson appeals that portion of an order reducing spousal support from $1,500 to $345 because of a change in circumstances arising from Leslie Stephenson’s election to take an early retirement at age 59. She contends Leslie’s decision to retire early from his $75,000-a-year job constituted a voluntary and deliberate attempt to reduce or extinguish his spousal support obligation, requiring the trial court to consider his earning capacity in evaluating his request for termination or modification of support.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Marriage of Prietsch & CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of GavronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Khera v. SameerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re Marriage of BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Marriage of TydlaskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Paulin v. PaulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rising v. RisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.