Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Regnery

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1989No. Docket Nos. D006665, D007345PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

In these consolidated appeals from a judgment of dissolution and posttrial orders, Frank Regnery contends the trial court erred in refusing to modify temporary spousal and child support, in awarding permanent support, and in its postdissolution order denying modification of permanent support.

Frank, unemployed at the time of each order he attacks, contends the trial court (1) improperly applied the capacity to earn standard when determining permanent support at a time he was unemployed; (2) abused its discretion in not reducing the permanent support payments upon his showing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. West v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Destein v. DesteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Paulin v. PaulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API