In Re the Marriage of Regnery
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
In these consolidated appeals from a judgment of dissolution and posttrial orders, Frank Regnery contends the trial court erred in refusing to modify temporary spousal and child support, in awarding permanent support, and in its postdissolution order denying modification of permanent support.
Frank, unemployed at the time of each order he attacks, contends the trial court (1) improperly applied the capacity to earn standard when determining permanent support at a time he was unemployed; (2) abused its discretion in not reducing the permanent support payments upon his showing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- West v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Destein v. DesteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Paulin v. PaulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.