Legal Opinion

Cavana v. Addison Miller, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1927No. 4990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

A motion has been interposed by the defendant in error to strike the bill of exceptions from the record and files, on the ground that it was not settled or certified within the term, or within the time allowed by law. Inasmuch as the assignments of error are all predicated upon the ruling of the court granting an involuntary nonsuit, if this motion is granted, there is no question before us for review.

The facts in relation to the settlement and certification of the bill of exceptions are as follows: The case was tried .during the April term, 1926, of the court below,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. O'CONNELL v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
  5. Russo-Chinese Bank v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. HardingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  2. Brady v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1932
  3. Rutherford v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API