Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 2, 1929No. 11795Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is urged on the part of the government that it is a matter in which the court could exercise discretion and that it ought to be exercised in favor of the government, and that the plaintiff in any event can have the matter determined by the Court of Appeals upon a motion to strike.

The Supreme Court, in O’Connell v. United States, 253 U. S. 142, 40 S. Ct. 444, 64. L. Ed. 827, held that the court’s jurisdiction over the case ceased on the expiration of the term as extended, and that any act in the settlement of the bill of exceptions thereafter is eoram non…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. O'CONNELL v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Cavana v. Addison Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API