Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Harding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1932No. 6681PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This is a hearing on the return of the judge of the United States District Court for the Territory of Alaska, First Division, to an order to show cause why mandamus should not issue commanding him to settle a bill of exceptions in the above-entitled cause. An order to show cause on the petition was issued by this court.
The record before this court consists of the petition, the return to the order to show cause, the answer to the return, and three affidavits attached to the respondent’s points and authorities. All the pleadings are verified. -
There is a sharp conflict…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- In Re Bills of ExceptionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Goetzinger v. WoodleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Coberth v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Allen Gasoline Co. v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Meyer v. KerriganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933