Legal Opinion

Breakey v. Inspector General

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 4, 1993No. 1:93-cv-10250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CUSTOMER CHALLENGE TO GOVERNMENT SUBPOENA

CLELAND, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is before the Court on Thomas Breakey’s (Movant) customer challenge to an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued by the Office of the Inspector General. Oral argument on the challenge (and the response thereto) was held on October 18, 1993. For the reasons stated herein,

IT IS ORDERED that the customer challenge to the administrative subpoena is DENIED, and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the subpoena shall be ENFORCED.

II. BACKGROUND

On August 13, 1993, the Office of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Hunt v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  5. Hancock v. MarshallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonough v. WidnallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  2. In Re BlundenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
  3. Lerman v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Chang v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API