Legal Opinion

Chang v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 21, 2000No. 3:99-cv-00029PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JARVIS, Chief Judge.

These cases are presently before the court on the Reports and Recommendations [Docs. 18 and 16, respectively] filed by the Honorable Robert P. Murrian, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 22, 1999. There have been no timely objections filed to these R & Rs. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Rule 72(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

After a careful review of these matters, the court is in complete agreement with Judge Murrian’s analysis of the issues surrounding the subpoenas in question. Accordingly, the R & Rs are hereby ACCEPTED IN WHOLE whereby Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Compact Van Equipment Co., Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. Wade H. Barrineau, Iii, Added on Counterclaim-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Hunt v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  5. The Building And Construction Department v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sierra Club v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API