Legal Opinion
In Re Blunden
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 18, 1995No. CV 95-4299-RSWL(RMCx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.Supp. 996 (1995)
In re Administrative Subpoena Directed to Craig BLUNDEN, Custodian of Records, Provident Savings Bank.
No. CV 95-4299-RSWL(RMCx).
United States District Court, C.D. California.
August 18, 1995.
Miguel P. Inumerable, Inumerable and Inumerable, Los Angeles, CA, for movant.
Faith A. Devine, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for U.S.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On June 28, 1995, Blas and Azucena Taon (hereafter "the Taons") filed a Motion to Quash the administrative subpoena duces tecum (hereafter "subpoena") served by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sandsend Financial Consultants, Ltd. v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Hunt v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Collins v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Hancock v. MarshallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ConstantinosDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.District Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Sequeira v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024