Legal Opinion
United States v. Katz
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 1, 1926No. 726, 727PublishedCited by 252 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The two defendants in error in each of these cases were indicted in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for a conspiracy to sell intoxicating liquors without making a {Permanent record of the sale, in violation of § 10, Title II of the National Prohibition Act, of October-28,1919, c. 85, 41 Stat. 305, 310.
The indictment in No. 726 charged that the defendant Katz conspired with the defendant Senn to sell for the Stewart Distilling Company, to Senn, a quantity of whisky, without making a record of the sale. A similar offense was charged against the defendants named in the indictment in No. 727.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.