Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Vensel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1977No. 44537PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Dennis Vensel filed a personal restraint petition seeking post-conviction relief on the ground he was not informed of the consequences of guilty pleas he entered to four charges in district court. We hold his pleas should be set aside unless it can be shown by evidence outside the record they were intelligently and voluntarily made with full knowledge of the consequences of those pleas.

Petitioner appeared with his then appointed counsel on February 23, 1976, and pleaded guilty to driving while under the influence or affected by the use of intoxicating liquor, no operator's license; driving a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. United States ex rel. Pebworth v. ConteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Yellowwolf v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. State v. TaftWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Miesbauer v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of KeeneWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. MajorsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Young v. KonzWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API