Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1981No. 46197PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosellini, J. —

This personal restraint petition is based upon a contention that the petitioner's plea of guilty was invalid because he did not understand the nature of the crime of forgery and the consequences of the plea.

Keene, a high school dropout, pleaded guilty to three counts of forgery. He had signed a typewritten statement prepared by his attorney and required by CrR 4.2(g).

In that statement the petitioner acknowledged that: the court had told him he was charged with three counts of forgery, the maximum sentence for each count being 5 years' imprisonment, or a $5,000 fine, or both;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of HaglerWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API