In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rosellini, J. —
This personal restraint petition is based upon a contention that the petitioner's plea of guilty was invalid because he did not understand the nature of the crime of forgery and the consequences of the plea.
Keene, a high school dropout, pleaded guilty to three counts of forgery. He had signed a typewritten statement prepared by his attorney and required by CrR 4.2(g).
In that statement the petitioner acknowledged that: the court had told him he was charged with three counts of forgery, the maximum sentence for each count being 5 years' imprisonment, or a $5,000 fine, or both;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HaglerWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.