Legal Opinion
Yellowwolf v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1976No. Nos. 75-1300, 75-1546PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and REAL,* District Judge. CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Yellowwolf and Miesbauer each applied for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that this court’s ruling in United States ex rel. Pebworth v. Conte, 489 F.2d 266 (9th Cir. 1974), should be applied retroactively. The district court dismissed the petitions. We affirm.
Yellowwolf was charged with grand larceny in Yakima County, Washington and appeared for arraignment on June 19, 1969. He was informed that he had a right to counsel before he entered a plea to the charge and a right to appointed counsel…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sidney Allen Worthen v. Larry R. Meachum, Director Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- State v. BraselCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Anders Steinsvik v. Douglas VinzantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re the Personal Restraint of VenselWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Robert M. Miller v. Daniel J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.