Legal Opinion
State v. Barton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1980No. 46231PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
This case presents the issue of whether a defendant, upon entering a plea of guilty, must be informed of the possibility of sentence enhancement under the habitual criminal statute, RCW 9.92.090. We hold that neither constitutional due process nor CrR 4.2(d) requires that a defendant be advised of a possible habitual criminal proceeding.
On or about May 16, 1977, defendant was arraigned on charges of possessing stolen property in the first degree, count 1; taking a motor vehicle without permission, count 2; *303and possessing stolen property in the second degree, counts 3 and 4. Defendant entered…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- O'Bryan v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JimenezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Mitschke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.