Legal Opinion

Young v. Konz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1979No. 44071, 44214PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

A rehearing was granted in Young v. Konz, 88 Wn.2d 276, 558 P.2d 791 (1977) (Young I). At issue in the original appeal, as well as the rehearing, is the constitutionality of the state's judicial structure insofar as it permits the utilization of nonlawyer judges in certain courts of limited jurisdiction. These courts exercise jurisdiction over criminal misdemeanor matters which may result in a defendant's loss of liberty.

We held in Young I that our statutory scheme permitting such lay judges did not violate constitutional due process and equal protection guaranties. We reaffirm our conclusion.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gordon v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of KeeneWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. FramptonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API