Legal Opinion

ARGENTINIS v. Fortuna

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 3, 2012No. AC 33045PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

Connecticut courts are solicitous of self-represented parties when it does not interfere with the rights of other parties. See Watkins v. Thomas, 118 Conn. App. 452, 456, 984 A.2d 106 (2009). Our courts allow self-represented parties some latitude, but that latitude is constrained by our rules of practice; see, e.g., Oliphant v. Commissioner of Correction, 274 Conn. 563, 569-70, 877 A.2d 761 (2005); the purpose of which “is to provide a just determination of every proceeding.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Snowdon v. Grillo, 114 Conn. App. 131, 137, 968 A.2d 984 (2009).…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gaynor v. Hi-Tech HomesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Spilke v. WicklowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Fezollari v. JauzovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API