ARGENTINIS v. Fortuna
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
Connecticut courts are solicitous of self-represented parties when it does not interfere with the rights of other parties. See Watkins v. Thomas, 118 Conn. App. 452, 456, 984 A.2d 106 (2009). Our courts allow self-represented parties some latitude, but that latitude is constrained by our rules of practice; see, e.g., Oliphant v. Commissioner of Correction, 274 Conn. 563, 569-70, 877 A.2d 761 (2005); the purpose of which “is to provide a just determination of every proceeding.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Snowdon v. Grillo, 114 Conn. App. 131, 137, 968 A.2d 984 (2009).…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gaynor v. Hi-Tech HomesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Spilke v. WicklowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Fezollari v. JauzovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.