Bennett v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Tjroutt, Judge. ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. In the complaint it is averred that *338plaintiffs contracted and agreed with defendants “to furnish in the addition to, and in the alteration of, the certain building heretofore erected on said premises by said Davis, certain materials, to wit, certain mantels, tiles, and grates,' and the appurtenances thereof; and also the labor required in the addition of the same to, and the erection of the same in, said building as a part thereof,” etc.
The mantels and other materials were furnished and were erected in the house of defendant Davis,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hinckley v. Field's Biscuit & Cracker Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- La Grill v. MallardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Flint v. CorbittNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1876
3Cited by14 opinions
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bryson v. McConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Caulfield v. PolkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Hihn-Hammond Lumber Co. v. ElsomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.