Legal Opinion

La Grill v. Mallard

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1891No. 14189PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, in which plaintiffs obtained a decree, the defendant having filed an answer and then failed to appear at the trial. He now appeals from the judgment, and insists that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The notice of lien was filed thirty-four days after the completion of the work. If the plaintiffs were not original contractors, the complaint is fatally defective, and will not support the judgment, for the notice of lien was not filed within thirty days. The evidence not being before us, this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Sparks v. Butte County Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hihn-Hammond Lumber Co. v. ElsomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bennett v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pugh v. MoxleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API