Hihn-Hammond Lumber Co. v. Elsom
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
A number of persons, each claiming a mechanic’s lien on the same property, began separate actions to foreclose the liens. These actions were consolidated for trial and resulted in a joint judgment of foreclosure. The building, on account of which the liens accrued, was erected prior to the enactment of the amendment of 1911 to the mechanic’s lien law, in pursuance of a contract which was valid under the prior law. The liens amounted to more than the balance found due from the owner to the contractor. This made it necessary to apportion the balance to the respective claimants, and to declare…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bryson v. McConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Von Arx v. San Francisco Gruetli VereinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hinckley v. Field's Biscuit & Cracker Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Humboldt Electric Light & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Bennett v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bird v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Indiana Limestone Co. v. CuthbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- J. Watts Kearny & Sons v. PerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.