Legal Opinion

Caulfield v. Polk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1897No. 2,109PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This was a proceeding by appellant to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Upon a special finding of the facts, the court stated its conclusions of law in appellee’s favor. The court’s conclusions of law upon the facts found, and overruling the motion for a new trial are the errors assigned.

The facts found are, substantially, that, on the 24th day of June, 1893, the appellee entered into a contract with the Eagle Machine Works, a corporation, .by which the machine works agreed to sell and furnish to the appellee an engine and boiler for appellee’s canning factory, located on certain real estate in *430Gre…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Colter v. FreseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Neeley v. SearightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Smith v. NewbaurIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nash Engineering Co. v. Marcy Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad v. SheraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. American Buildings Co. v. Wheelers StoresWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Evansville v. Verplank Concrete & Supply, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. American Tank & Equipment Co. v. T. E. Wiggins, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API