Legal Opinion

Stemmelin v. Matterport, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 7, 2020No. 3:20-cv-04168Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOHN STEMMELIN, individually and behalf of those similarly situated, 11 No. C 20-04168 WHA Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 ORDER GRANTING MOTION MATTERPORT, INC., et al., TO DISMISS 14 Defendants. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this false and deceptive advertising putative class action, defendants move to dismiss 18 for lack of standing and for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, the motion is 19 GRANTED. 20 STATEMENT 21 Defendants, Matterport, Inc., and its officers, market “3D cameras that create 3D models 22…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API