California Restaurant Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVICH, J.
This appeal presents the question of whether the doctrine of preemption precludes the City of Los Angeles from enacting an ordinance that requires the posting of health warnings, wherever alcoholic beverages are sold, cautioning that drinking alcohol during pregnancy can cause birth defects. We hold that the doctrine of preemption does not apply and affirm the trial court’s judgment rejecting a preemption challenge.
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Ordinance
On June 11,1986, Los Angeles Municipal Code section 46.80 was enacted unanimously by the city council as Ordinance No. 161361…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Galvan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Burton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lancaster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Citizens for Uniform Laws v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. SchlimbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Mussalli v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Wiseman Park, LLC v. S. Glazer's Wine & Spirits, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.