Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1996No. A068638PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

Many California cities must grapple with nuisances associated with alcoholic beverage sale establishments. Some local entities have adopted ordinances to identify those activities associated with alcoholic beverage sales that constitute nuisances and to eliminate their attendant threat to the public health and welfare by means of an administrative process. The proprietors of alcoholic beverage sale establishments challenge these ordinances, arguing that they trod on the state’s exclusive right to regulate and tax alcoholic beverage sales. We hold that a city ordinance…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Burton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Quidel Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API