Legal Opinion

Citizens for Uniform Laws v. County of Contra Costa

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1991No. A051054PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. Introduction

In this case we hold that a county may adopt an ordinance prohibiting discrimination against those who undergo health testing which discloses an infectious disease, for the public health purpose of encouraging citizens to be tested without fear of discrimination in order to learn of the presence of the disease and prevent its transmission, even though the state has preempted the field of protecting civil rights by prohibiting some of the same discriminatory practices.

This taxpayer’s suit challenges a county ordinance which prohibits discriminatory practices…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Wirin v. HorrallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Rental Housing Assn. of Northern Alameda County v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Delaney v. Superior Fast FreightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Santa Barbara County Coalition Against Automobile Subsidies v. Santa Barbara County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API