Legal Opinion

Galvan v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1969No. S. F. No. 22642PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is a petition for writ of mandate by John Galvan, a resident, taxpayer and firearms owner in San Francisco, in which he attacks the constitutionality of ordinance No. 175-68, the so-called San Francisco gun law. The ordinance, enacted in July 1968, provides for the registration of all firearms within San Francisco, with certain exceptions.1

Galvan contends that the San Francisco gun law is void because the law conflicts directly with state laws regulating firearms, and, even if construed to avoid a direct conflict, invades the field of weapons control, which has assertedly been preempted…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API