Legal Opinion
Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 10, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
278 N.J. Super. 521 (1995)
651 A.2d 1033
RIKI DINTER AND ELLIOTT DINTER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, DEFENDANT, AND BERTRAM SIEGEL, AND SIEGEL & SIEGEL, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 28, 1994.
Decided January 10, 1995.
Before Judges PETRELLA, HAVEY and BROCHIN.
Bennett J. Wasserman argued the cause for appellants.
Bertram Siegel argued the cause for respondents Bertram Siegel and Siegel & Siegel (Bertram Siegel, of counsel; Todd Siegel, on the brief).
Frank P. Addas appeared on behalf of defendant Sears, Roebuck &…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Faro v. RomaniSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- International Materials Corp. v. Sun Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- La Mantia v. DurstNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Glick v. Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Estate of Pinter v. McGeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Bruno v. Gale, Wentworth & Dillon RealtyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Matter of Estate of TravarelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.