Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
A contingent fee retainer agreement, on a form supplied by counsel, "to prosecute or adjust” a client’s personal injury claim, with no provision regarding the advance of litigation expenses is — in the context of the present case — unclear, and will be read most favorably for the client. Here we conclude that, so construed, the retainer agreement ended upon an adverse judgment following trial and that, even if this agreement persisted through appeal, it required the attorney to continue advancing the client’s litigation expenses. In either event counsel is entitled…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gair v. PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Crowley v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Vitale v. La CourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lawrence v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- King v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lawrence v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.