Legal Opinion
La Mantia v. Durst
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 1989PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 N.J. Super. 534 (1989)
561 A.2d 275
JUDY A. LA MANTIA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN F. DURST, R.H. BORGERSEN, AND PAUL KLENOFF, DEFENDANTS. EVANS, OSBORNE & KREIZMAN, ESQS., PETITIONER-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
MONTE & MARRIOTT, ESQS., RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 9, 1989.
Decided June 28, 1989.
Before Judges PETRELLA, GRUCCIO and LANDAU.
Robert J. Kelly argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney, attorneys).
Thomas D. Monte, Jr., argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Monte & Marriott, attorneys;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bak-A-Lum Corp. of America v. Alcoa Building Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- State v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Buckelew v. GrossbardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Paulsen v. HalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Starkey v. Estate of NicolaysenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Kopelman and Associates, L.C. v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Kopin v. Orange Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Kas Oriental Rugs, Inc. v. EllmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.