Legal Opinion
Glick v. Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 28, 1997PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of this court was delivered by
LONG, P.J.A.D.
In June, 1992, plaintiffs, Francine Glick and Annette Kraus, retained Jonathan D. Strum, an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and the State of New York, to represent them in an employment discrimination action against their former employer and related companies, defendants, Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc., Barclays De Zoete Wedd—Information Technology Group, Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Ltd. (Barclays), and Laslo Gross.
In September, 1992, Strum forwarded to plaintiffs a proposed contingent fee agreement for their…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Kopin v. Orange Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- La Mantia v. DurstNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Buckelew v. GrossbardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Starkey v. Estate of NicolaysenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Nostrame v. SantiagoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- In Re Safety Components, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bruno v. Gale, Wentworth & Dillon RealtyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.