In Re Spencer
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus to J. F. Dinan, Chief of Police of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The petitioner was arrested and confined upon a charge of violating sections 2 and 4 of the act of February 20, 1905, regulating the employment and hours of labor of children, and prohibiting the employment of illiterate minors and of minors under certain ages. (Stats. 1905, pp. 11, 14.) The return to the preliminary writ shows that the petitioner was arrested and -taken into custody upon four several complaints, relating to four different children, each complaint charging him with employing a child under fourteen years of age in the workshop and boiler-room of a steamer, the child not then…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bourland v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- People ex rel. Morgan v. HayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- University of California v. BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by37 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. TurvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.