Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Eiseman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1926No. Docket No. 1206PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The defendants, J. J. Eiseman, Alexander R. Abrams, Holmes Ives, N. J. Whelan, and John I. Pankratz, were jointly indicted by the grand jury of the city and county of San Francisco for the crimes of conspiracy to violate and of having violated the California Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673), which declares in part that “no company shall sell . . . , or offer for sale, negotiate for the sale of, or take subscriptions for any securities of its own until it shall have first applied for and secured from the commissioner a permit authorizing it so to do . . . ” (sec. 3); and that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. FinchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. BucchierreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API