Legal Opinion

Wege v. Safe-Cabinet Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1918No. 2982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Western District of Michigan; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge. Bill by the Safe-Cabinet Company against Peter M. Wege. Prom a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree requiring Wege to assign certain letters patent and all his rights thereunder, including all claims for past infringements of the patent, to the Safe-Cabinet Company. Wege and the company entered into a written contract on August 7, 1909, whereby Wege was engaged as superintendent of the company upon a salary schedule fixing his compensation according to the amount of business which the company might transact in a series of years, commencing with a .minimum salary of $3,000, and running to a maximum of $5,000. On September 8th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  3. WM. B. Scaife & Sons Co. v. Falls City Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Hulse v. Bonsack Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895
  5. American Cone & Wafer Co. v. Consolidated Wafer Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Conway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. Conway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Piggly Wiggly Corporation v. SaundersDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
  5. Erie R. v. SchleenbakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API