Legal Opinion

Hulse v. Bonsack Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1895No. 108PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of tlie United States for the Western District of Virginia. This was a suit by the Bonsack Machine Company against W. A. Hulse and R. H. Wright to enjoin the assignment of a patent.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of tlie United States for the Western District of Virginia. This was a suit by the Bonsack Machine Company against W. A. Hulse and R. H. Wright to enjoin the assignment of a patent. Upon .the hearing in the circuit court, an injunction was granted, and the cause was referred to a master, to ascertain what wonld be proper compensation to be awarded to defendants under an. agreement by plaintiff to make such compensation (57 Fed. 519). Upon the coming in of the report, a final decree was entered, awarding $8,126.36. Both parties appeal. These are cross appeals…

1Opinion of the CourtSimonton, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts). The contract be tween the Bonsack Machine Company and Hulse is in these words and figures:

“That the said company has this day employed the said Hulse to set up and operate its cigarette machines at a salary of §50 for the first month, and *866$65 per month thereafter, with such advance of salary, up to not exceeding $.75 per month, as the services of the said Hulse may justify. It is agreed that the said Hulse will serve the company wherever desired, the company to pay his railroad fares whenever traveling at the request of the company. No abatement will be made for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Morse Twist Drill & Machine Co. v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Mississippi Glass Co. v. FranzenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  5. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API