Legal Opinion

Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. Gill

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 18, 1887PublishedCited by 49 opinions

In Equity. On planter patents.

1Opinion of the Court

Bradley, Justice.

The bill in this case was filed to restrain the infringement of two certain patents, and to recover profits and damages for the infringement thereof. The patents sued on were granted to Lewis Augustus Aspinwall for improvements in potato planters, — one dated' December 14, 1880, and numbered 285,4.01, but subject to the limitation prescribed by section 4887, llev. St. U. S., by reason of a British patent for the same invention, dated October 27, 1874, and July 30, 1878; the other patent sued on was dated May 8, 1883, and numbered 276,994. By separate deeds of assignment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by49 opinions

Atari Games Corporation and Tengen, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Nintendo of America, Inc., and Nintendo Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
Gibbs v. Emerson Electric Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
Bell & Howell Co. v. BlissCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.