Legal Opinion

Conway v. White

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 1925No. 233PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

This is the second time this ease has been before this court. When the case first came before the District Court a motion was made to dismiss the bill on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The District Judge granted the motion and dismissed the bill. On appeal to this court wo held that the bill stated facts sufficient, if true, to entitle the plaintiffs to the relief sought. We accordingly reversed the decree and remanded the case, with directions to reinstate the bill, and proceed to the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Cheney v. LibbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Hennessy v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Hector Medrano, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  5. National School Studios, Inc. v. MealeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API