Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1991No. 2423PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether under Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), the trial court erred in dismissing drunk driving charges against Richard Lee Adams where he had previously pled guilty to the summary offense of reckless driving. The trial court found that double jeopardy barred his subsequent prosecution for drunk driving which arose out of the same incident. We conclude that, under the circumstances of the instant case, the principles announced in Grady v. Corbin do not require dismissal on double jeopardy grounds. Therefore, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. LabelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellezzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. MoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. CaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. AikinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API