Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1992No. 00390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Is appellant, John T. Mitchell’s conviction violative of the constitutional proscription against double jeopardy as recently interpreted by the United States Supreme Court in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990)?

Mitchell was observed by a police officer exiting from an overturned vehicle. After being taken to the hospital for treatment, he was discovered to have a blood alcohol level of .331. His driving status at the time was that his operator’s license had been revoked. He was first prosecuted for the charge of operating a vehicle while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. LabelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Matter of HuffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. BreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API